Corporate Finance

Page 1 of 3

Taking a Long-term View With a highly uncertain regulatory environment, and questions over the likely shape of the financing market in the coming months, a flexible, long-term portfolio is more important than ever. We speak to the Director of Treasury & Funding at Borealis about their approach.

Taking a Long-term View

Borealis Taking a Long-term View

by Jan-Martin Nufer, Director of Treasury & Funding, Borealis

We established our new funding and banking strategy in Borealis 2007, with the aim of creating a diverse and robust finance portfolio. This was the start of a journey on which we have been travelling ever since, with the aim of achieving the ‘ideal’ funding portfolio, which in reality, doesn’t have a final end point. Minimisation of funding costs alone is, in my view, not a strategy or long-term vision. As a result, cost reduction is only one factor amongst other, more important parameters, in building a solid funding backbone. Over the past eight years, we have concluded a suite of financing transactions exceeding EUR 5bn in value, including a series of ‘firsts’, marking a major ramp up in the sophistication and precision in our approach to funding.

Credit characteristics

Borealis is an unrated corporation in the petrochemicals, polyolefins and base chemicals, sector, with business cyclicality typical of the industry. We have two shareholders: International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC) of Abu Dhabi (64%) with the remaining 36% held by OMV Aktiengesellschaft, one of Austria’s largest listed industrial companies, with both upstream and downstream oil and gas activities. Borealis operates various joint ventures, by far the most important being Borouge, a company co-owned together with ADNOC, the national oil company of Abu Dhabi.

Borealis has historically been a ‘story credit’. Due to our business profile and the unique characteristics of our combined European and Middle East production capacities, it is not easy to do a standard credit assessment using the traditional ratios and peer comparisons, which are already difficult in our sector. This combination of factors means that our corporate profile is not as obviously clear to investors as those of publicly-owned businesses with more regular cash flow and straightforward income statements. However, once our business profile has been explained, we achieve implied credit ratings well above the industry average. In the context of selecting of the most appropriate instruments, this also means that making direct contact with potential investors and financing institutions is key for the selection of the best funding avenue.

Jan-Martin Nufer
Jan-Martin Nufer poses with financing transaction "tombstones" and awards won by Borealis - including 2 TMI Corporate Recognition Awards!

Step 1: Defining parameters

As a first step, we needed to establish the strategic parameters that would guide the efforts. These consisted of:

  • diversification, across markets, sectors and geographies;
  • active maturity profile management, and
  • the selection of suitable instruments.

The last point always needs to take into account the market conditions prevailing at a given time. Besides the long-term goals, market windows and comparative cost advantages between the options are the inevitable short-term parameters when defining the most appropriate funding solutions. In sum, the strategic funding activities have to meet the needs of the business, combined with best cost-reward relationship for the company.

Next Page   2 3 

Whilst the vast majority of our articles will always be free to view, this article forms part of a series of Premium Corporate Case Studies written by treasurers.

To access this article and the complete series on TMI Academy: Click here

 

A premium digital subscription to TMI articles is also available. This allows you 12 months access to all premium case study content. To access this premium subscription: Click here

 

TMI Academy