Risk Management

Page 1 of 2

Equipping Treasury to Manage Event Risk Jiro Okochi, Co-founder and CEO of Reval, talks to Helen Sanders, Editor, on how geopolitical events are influencing treasury priorities - with particular reference to the result of the Brexit referendum.

Equipping Treasury to Manage Event Risk

Equipping Treasury to Manage Event Risk

An Executive Interview with Jiro Okochi, Co-founder and CEO, Reval


In this edition of TMI, which coincides with this year’s flagship EuroFinance conference, Jiro Okochi, Co-founder and CEO of treasury and risk management solution provider Reval talks to Helen Sanders, Editor, on how geopolitical events are influencing treasury priorities. In particular, the result of the Brexit referendum which came as a surprise to many commentators, emphasised the need to anticipate and mitigate the impact of unexpected outcomes.


Event risk has become top of mind for treasurers globally, in many cases prompted by the result of the Brexit referendum. What have you seen amongst your clients and prospects?

Jiro OkochiWhile the lead-up  and result of the Brexit referendum will continue to be memorable for many reasons, it is a scenario that has yet to play out; however, despite all the commentary on what the immediate as well as longer-term impacts on jobs, lenders and investors might be, there has been very little discussion, even amongst the financial community, on the technology implications for corporate treasurers. Treasurers are not tasked to predict the future, but they do need to anticipate the potential impact of any major risk event, including potential outcomes, rather than trying to manage the effects afterwards. To do this successfully, they need the right technology in place to analyse risk and model different scenarios.

During our conversations with prospective customers, we have often been surprised at the number of treasurers of major corporations that were unable to conduct comprehensive analysis of risk events and scenarios before acquiring our solutions. There seems to be a number of reasons for this.

Firstly, many treasurers with constrained resources already find it challenging to manage day-to-day cash, liquidity and risk management activities; therefore, they do not have time to look beyond this. For these treasurers, the priority should be to ensure that a treasury and risk management solution is in place to be able to automate and streamline day-to-day activities, as well as providing analytic tools.

In other cases, treasurers may have a treasury management system in place, but lack the tools and data to develop risk analytics models. They are therefore typically limited to the capabilities of generic software and spreadsheets, which also create issues with security, integrity and auditability.  Although the use of spreadsheets is widespread and convenient, there are limitations in the range of scenarios that can be captured, combined and stored, and difficulties in integrating the full range of data that is required for sophisticated analytics. As a result, treasurers are often spending too much time on even basic risk analytics and are unable to respond quickly to senior management requests.


What tools should treasurers be using to manage event risk? 

Scenario analysis is an essential risk analytic tool for treasurers. This is offered by many treasury and risk management systems, but not necessarily with the level of functionality that treasurers require. For example, a system may allow a treasurer to assess the risk impact of a change  to a parallel shift to a single curve, but this is not how the real world behaves, where shocks can cause inversions of prices and of course multiple scenarios. In contrast, Reval allows users to store a wide variety of user-defined risk models that can be adapted and interrogated, as well as produced regularly as part of a monthly or quarterly management reporting.

Many treasurers who stress test for scenario analysis may not stress enough. The effect of more severe shocks beyond the ad-hoc scenario is therefore well-suited to evaluating event risk, of which the Brexit referendum is a clear example. Immediately after the referendum result was announced, we saw equity markets plummet and then bounce back again, and GBP fell sharply against USD and EUR. Since then, the UK has a new prime minister, currency rates have remained at around their post-referendum level, interest rates have fallen to 0.25% and considerable uncertainty remains over the form that Brexit will take. Each of these factors has an impact on risk, and even more in combination. Measuring the impact of a 5 or 10% change in currency rates is meaningless if the effect of interest rate changes and other variables are not also factored in, so the ability to perform multi-dimensional risk analysis is essential.

Once treasurers have conducted scenario analysis and stress testing, they can then determine where additional risk measures may be required. As we saw before the Brexit referendum, some companies may choose to buy out-of-the-money options to cushion the business from the impact of event risk. While binary (otherwise known as digital) options are not commonly used for day-to-day hedging, they can be very useful in managing event risk as they do not offer simply a pro-rata payment, but a one-off return in the event of a dramatic fall in the value of a currency, for example.  So it is important to have a treasury system that can handle products that you may not think you need to today.


Next Page   2 

Save PDFs of your favorite articles, authors and companies. Bookmark this article, or add to a list of your favorites within mytmi.

Discover the benefits of myTMI

 Download this article for free