Financial Supply Chain

Page 1 of 2

After 25 Years, SCF 1.0 Needs A Makeover For supply chain finance (SCF) to progress and reach the next set of struggling suppliers, the model needs a rethink. Time for SCF 2.0?

After 25 years, SCF 1.0 Needs A Makeover

by David Brown, Co-founder and Chief Product Officer, Previse

For supply chain finance (SCF) to progress and reach the next set of struggling suppliers, the model needs a rethink. We need SCF 2.0.

Getting to grips with late payments is easier said than done. A single purchase from end-to-end involves multiple departments, and often requires a whole host of steps to ensure compliance.

On face value, SCF looks like the late payments silver bullet. It allows a third-party funder to forward the value of an invoice, minus a small charge, on to the supplier just a few days after the invoice has been approved. Then, the SCF provider recoups the money on the back-end of the payment process, perhaps some 120 days later.

But, SCF has been around for some 25 years and late payments, particularly for small suppliers, have gotten worse. Further, banks’ revenues from SCF stand at just $2.8 billion per year, a drop in the ocean of global trade [1] . What is going on here? To answer that, we need to look into the SCF fine print.

For the few not the many

In principle, SCF is a good solution for many suppliers. It is cheaper than other options available to a supplier, such as factoring or taking out credit based on the supplier’s own rating, and it provides a reliable way for suppliers to be paid before the payment terms are reached.

The biggest hurdle to a supplier receiving these benefits, however, is simply access. One hurdle is on the side of the SCF providers offering the programmes. To onboard a new supplier, an SCF provider has to undertake a host of checks including know-your-customer and anti-money laundering checks. For the onboarding of the very largest suppliers, typically around 1% of suppliers by number, these costs can be justified, but for everyone else, it simply isn’t economical for an SCF provider to take on their business.

That isn’t to say, however, that all the suppliers left out are a small matter [2]. Taken on aggregate, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) payables represent about $2.3 trillion in unmet demand for financing. The traditional SCF model just doesn’t have a way to help here.

Given that around two-thirds of global employment and growth comes from SMEs, that leaves a huge number of jobs and a lot of economic activity shut out from SCF.

The devil is in the detail

If you are lucky enough to be a sufficiently large supplier to be onboarded by the SCF provider, you should receive funds a few days after your invoice has been approved. But how long does it take to get your invoice approved? And how long does that take if you are a smaller supplier and not prioritised?

The answer is, often, a very long time.

A supplier’s work doesn’t start the day the invoice is issued. Many suppliers will have started spending on staff, equipment and materials well before it issues its invoice. It then takes the typical large buyer a considerable time to verify and approve an invoice. After all, they have to double check the terms and do all the checks to ensure it isn’t a duplicate or fraudulent payment. That can be a cumbersome process and when a business is dealing with tens of thousands of suppliers it can be time and labour intensive as well.

Many buyers have started using electronic platforms such as e-invoicing to speed up some steps of this process. On the face of it, that is a good idea and where it can be used it has helped speed up invoice processing. For the suppliers, however, adopting any of these platforms requires a significant investment in terms of time and resources that often only makes sense if you have reached a certain minimum scale. And guess who, by definition, does not have this scale? Right, the SMEs. Small suppliers are left out of the equation again, falling further back in the prioritisation queue. All this combined means that a supplier might have been working on an order and incurring expenses for six months or more before an invoice is finally approved by the buyer and SCF can kick-in. Even for quite a large supplier, that is going to put a significant strain on its cash flow.

Next Page   2 

Save PDFs of your favorite articles, authors and companies. Bookmark this article, or add to a list of your favorites within mytmi.

Discover the benefits of myTMI

 Link to special issue