Risk Management

Page 1 of 2

Turning Treasury Risks into Opportunities Issues such as late payments can negatively affect the relationship between the treasurer and the supplier. However, when these types of scenarios are perceived as opportunities rather than risks, both parties are able to benefit.

Turning Treasury Risks into Opportunities

Turning Treasury Risks into Opportunities

By Matt McQuillan, Managing Director, UK, C2FO

Emerging factors that at first sight look like fresh sources of risk may provide treasurers with scope to strengthen their relationships with suppliers.

FX… counterparties… interest rates... fraud. All are longstanding, traditional risk areas for corporate treasurers. Even cybersecurity has been acknowledged for several years now as a matter over which treasury departments must be particularly vigilant. But risk factors connected to the supply chain are forcing treasurers to pay greater attention to how they interact with the vendors on their companies’ books. Those factors are:

Matt McQuillan

Matt McQuillan
Managing Director, UK, C2FO

Supplier-based financial risks and sustainability issues

Almost one in five (17%) small firms operating within European supply chains frequently encounter payment terms longer than 60 days, according to research published last September by the UK’s Federation of Small Businesses (FSB). More than a third (37%) of smaller suppliers in the organisation’s membership reported that their payment terms had increased over the preceding two years. In some cases, payment-term extensions can be mitigated by supply chain finance (SCF) programmes. But often, these arrangements simply enable suppliers to play catch-up, rather than get ahead of the game, and primarily work for the largest suppliers, those companies least in need of liquidity. In reality, those at risk remain exposed to lengthy payment terms.

This scenario can strain relations between buyers and suppliers. Furthermore, it is crucial for suppliers to have a predictable inflow of payments to invest in innovation, so they can grow and develop their products and services for the benefit of their customers. If suppliers don’t have the scope to upgrade themselves in step with industry trends, then ultimately it is their buyers who will suffer.

Regulatory developments

A few regional and national initiatives have emerged to crack down on late payments. These schemes have put corporates on notice to act more responsibly towards suppliers and empathise with the problems that long-delayed transactions cause them. The EU’s 2011 Late Payment Directive set a continent-wide cap on payment terms at 60 days. UK-based examples include the Prompt Payment Code (PPC) and Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA). Meanwhile, the Netherlands’ not-for-profit Betaalme.nu – or ‘Pay Me Now’ – venture is looking to unlock $2.5bn of liquidity for Dutch SMEs by encouraging corporates to settle up faster.

However, these valuable initiatives are absent in many countries or industries in Europe: the FSB’s research indicates that compliance with the EU’s Directive is somehow shaky. Additionally, the UK PPC is a purely voluntary arrangement: in a recent report, 74% of subcontractors in the UK construction sector called for the Code to be made compulsory and while the GCA can enforce penalties, it only covers the major food retailers.

Capital erosion through inflation

In the wake of the financial crisis, it became de rigueur for corporates to stockpile spare capital for a rainy day, with the hard-to-read economic picture prompting treasurers to adopt a ‘wait and see’ approach to the assets within their purview. However, inflation is eating away at EMEA corporates’ capital reserves, reducing their purchasing power by as much as €20m per year on every €1bn of hoarded cash.


Next Page   2 

Save PDFs of your favorite articles, authors and companies. Bookmark this article, or add to a list of your favorites within mytmi.

Discover the benefits of myTMI

 Download this article for free