Financial Technology

Page 1 of 2

Future-Proofing Global Trade How the transaction banking evolution will benefit businesses In developing digital solutions, collaboration – rather than competition – between transaction banks and fintechs is increasingly being viewed as the way forward.

Future-Proofing Global Trade

How the transaction banking evolution will benefit businesses

Future-Proofing Global Trade 

By Luca Corsini, Global Head of Trade Finance at UniCredit, and designated Global Co-Head of GTB from 1 August 2017


A convergence of trends in the global trade environment is spurring many transaction banks to action. On a macro scale, a number of previously flourishing regions are seeing reduced demand for trade finance. The use of traditional bank-mediated trade finance instruments such as letters of credit is on the wane while open account transactions wax in lieu. Meanwhile, necessary regulatory and due diligence measures are adding further costs onto many banks’ P&L statements. 

Luca Corsini
Luca Corsini

Many transaction banks are responding by reviewing strategies and operating models at every level. Internal efficiency gains are of course an important step, but a more thorough re-examination of current approaches to client service and fintech collaboration is leading to the emergence of holistic and client-focused digital solutions that will ensure improved and sustainable services in the future. Good news, then, for corporates – who will enjoy a greater availability of digital solutions, at better prices, and with enhanced functionality.

 
RWA modelling concerns

Regulatory requirements – and the associated costs – are significant drivers of change, with many transaction banks upgrading their back-office systems in an effort to improve efficiency. Another trend we are witnessing – specific to trade finance – stems from the Basel Accord’s capital adequacy ratio (CAR) requirement, which aims to ensure that banks can absorb losses and protect against insolvency. The CAR measures a bank's capital in relation to its risk-weighted assets (RWA), but a lack of historical and performance data means that internal bank models used to calculate RWA do not currently reflect the low-risk status of trade finance as an asset class, even though market prices do.

However, many transaction banks value trade finance as a way to maintain and build new client relationships, so these low returns are often deemed acceptable.


Corporate clients and digital solutions in the spotlight

In any case, such concerns over the profitability of trade finance are causing many transaction banks to re-examine corporate client relationships as a way to potentially increase the provision of trade finance. For some, this entails segmenting clients by geography or industry sector, for example, or creating ‘platinum’ or ‘gold’ client brackets to offer greater flexibility over levels of client service. 

Digital solutions such as blockchain or the Bank Payment Obligation are also being discovered, or rediscovered, by many transaction banks. Standardising these solutions, increasing their efficiency, and making them more affordable will open them up to a wider market and create new lines of business, and these could potentially be offered in line with newly created client segments or brackets. Corporates, however, should be strategic in how they use their banks for trade finance. For example, being a ‘platinum’ client across fewer banks would bring better levels of service than spreading business across multiple banks as a ‘bronze’ client.

 

Next Page   2 

Save PDFs of your favorite articles, authors and companies. Bookmark this article, or add to a list of your favorites within mytmi.

Discover the benefits of myTMI

 Download this article for free