myTMI logo

Please login to access your profile



Country Focus

Page 1 of 2

Fast Track to SEPA Migration in Slovakia

by Marcela Výbohová, General Manager, Payments Division, CSOB

W ith adoption of the euro taking place in 2009, Slovakia is one of the most recent countries to join the single European currency, which includes adopting the Payment Services Directive (PSD) and the planned migration to the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) payment instruments. Migration to SEPA payment products is already under way in many European countries, with banks and corporates alike in the latter stages of preparation and in some cases migration, but with later euro adoption, transition plans in Slovakia are at a later stage of development. This article looks at the status of migration to SEPA in Slovakia and some of the opportunities and challenges that it presents for businesses located in the country.

Banks in Slovakia are making active preparations for migration within an aggressive timescale.

Preparing for migration

Banks in Slovakia are making active preparations for migration within an aggressive timescale. The National Bank of Slovakia is spearheading these efforts by publishing migration guides that will enable commercial banks to migrate processes and technology to support the new instruments. Banks such as ˜CSOB, KBC’s subsidiary in the Slovak republic, is proactively analysing, preparing and implementing changes to its own systems and processes to facilitate migration to SEPA. While the official deadline for SCT migration is February 2013, we are on target to support SEPA-based clearing by end 2012, a far shorter time than most countries have enjoyed.

SCT progress

Introducing SCT represents a more straightforward proposition than SDD, and consequently, the project to develop and support SCT is further advanced. The SCT (see box) is not fundamentally different from the existing domestic credit transfer, with the same pricing and value dating, although the technical standards (i.e., ISO 20022 formats) have not yet been introduced. As the requirements of the PSD (figure 1) have already been implemented, pricing of domestic and cross-border payments is now consistent. In reality, this has already had a significant impact on companies operating internationally, even before the SEPA payment products have been introduced, as cross-border transaction costs are reduced.

Consequently, we are not yet experiencing demand from corporate clients to migrate to SEPA, although it will ultimately be a requirement for all companies. Some subsidiaries of companies based in Germany and other European countries are keen to keep themselves informed about the status of SEPA migration plans so that they can integrate their Slovak payment operations with those in other countries, taking advantage of the technical convergence that SEPA offers.

SCT benefits

However, harmonising the technical, legal and pricing conditions for payments across the Eurozone brings considerable advantages particularly to companies operating internationally. In the past, it has often been difficult for multinational companies to centralise and standardise payments and collections processing. Consequently, many have maintained multiple banking partners with different interfaces, complex cash management structures to consolidate cash, and separate payments and collections departments with diverse processes and technology. SEPA therefore offers the ability to centralise payment, collection and cash management processes and rationalise the number of banking partners, with advantages such as:

  • Rationalise banks and bank accounts, reducing fragmentation of cash and cash-related information, managing counterparty risk more effectively and creating greater economies of scale;
  • Simplify cash management structures, reducing cost and complexity;
  • Reduce the number of banking interfaces, reducing costs and enhancing controls;
  • Standardise the communication formats used with banks across multiple interfaces using ISO 20022 formats;
  • Manage days payables outstanding more effectively, improving working capital;
  • Use best-in-class technology to replace existing fragmented systems, providing greater automation, efficiency and lower risk of fraud and error
  • Improve cashflow forecasting and reduce working capital requirement
  • Make strategic use of surplus cashflow: M&A, share buybacks, pay down debt or dividends.

Next Page 1 2 

If you wish to read the rest of this article, please login to your myTMI account
or simply register now for free.

You will then also be able to read online, download and print the article.

It only takes 30 seconds and you will also benefit from the following:

- Our Monthly eNewsletter
- Regular Treasury Updates
- Unlimited Article Downloads
- Access to all premium articles
- Access to MyTMI Area

Register today for free!

pdf icon  Download this article for free

Print Ready icon  Print Ready version of this article

Discover the benefits of myTMI

Save PDFs of your favorite articles, authors and companies. Bookmark this article, or add to a list of your favorites within mytmi.

Register Today for FREE!

Other Articles icon  Show articles by this author

email to firend  Share this articleShare article on LinkedIn  Share article on LinkedIn
Share article on Twitter  Share article on Facebook Share article on Twitter  Share article on Twitter

Marcela Výbohová Article by
Marcela Výbohová
General Manager, Payments Division, CSOB

add author to add to my tmi

back to Country Focus category

The Changing Landscape of Treasury Risk Management

TMI is published in association with:

EACT logo IGTA logo

Click here for international partners

  • ACTS logo
  • ACTSA logo
  • ACTSR logo
  • AFTE logo
  • AITI logo
  • ASSET logo
  • ATEB logo
  • ATEL logo
  • CAT logo
  • DACT logo
  • IACCT logo
  • IACT logo
  • JACFO logo
  • KCFO logo
  • SAF logo
  • LTA logo
  • SCTA logo
  • TMANY logo